PCS METH AF Assessment Form_v1.0

Document Control

Document identification

  • Document code: PCS-METH-AF

  • Title: Outcome of Assessment of Proposed New Methodology (Assessment Form)

  • Scope: Used by PCS Secretariat to communicate the PCS decision on a proposed methodology, including readiness for public consultation.

Version history and change log

Table DC-1. Revision history

Version
Date
Status
Summary of changes
Prepared by
Approved by

v1.0

TBD

Draft

Release for public consultation

PCS

TBD

Superseded versions

No superseded versions for v1.0.

Governance note on versioning and archiving

Only the latest approved version of this form shall be used. Superseded versions shall be archived and retained for traceability and audit purposes. Printed or downloaded copies are uncontrolled; the PCS Portal version is the authoritative current version.

Purpose

To be used by the PCS Secretariat to communicate the decision of the PCS Regulatory Council on its assessment of a proposed new methodology, including readiness for public consultation.

Section 1 – Administrative Details

Title of Proposed New Methodology

Reference Number of Proposed New Methodology

Underlying Project Activity – Title

Draft Project Submission Form (PSF) attached

☐ Yes ☐ No

Category of Methodology

☐ Regular ☐ Nature-based ☐ Technological removals

History of submission (rounds, key notes)

Section 2 – Decision on Global Stakeholder Consultation

☐ Approved for Global Stakeholder Consultation ☐ Rejected ☐ Work-in-Progress

List PCS requirements not met and required revisions/improvements:

Attach methodology draft with assessment comments (mandatory for Rejected and Work-in-Progress outcomes).

Link to PCS Portal listing comments received during consultation: https://__________________

Attach methodology draft with additional assessment comments (mandatory if any consultation comments were received).

Section 3 – Final Decision

☐ Approved ☐ Rejected ☐ Additional comments to address (see attached assessment comments)

If Rejected – reasons:

Section 4 – Methodology Assessment (Secretariat Use)

Criterion
Reference
Assessment Comments

GHG Sectoral Scope

PCS Methodology Standard § Scope

Applicability Conditions

PCS Methodology Standard § Applicability

Project Boundary

PCS Methodology Standard § Boundary

Baseline Scenario

PCS Methodology Standard § Baseline

Project Additionality

PCS Methodology Standard § Additionality

Emission Reductions/Removals

PCS Methodology Standard § Quantification

Leakage

PCS Methodology Standard § Leakage

Monitoring (Baseline & Project)

PCS Methodology Standard § Monitoring

Remaining Lifetime of Baseline Equipment

PCS Methodology Standard § Lifetime

Global Warming Potentials

PCS Methodology Standard § GWP

Other Findings

Section 5 – Uncertainty Requirements

Uncertainty calculations and requirements (if applicable to methodology):

Section 6 – Permanence Requirements (if applicable)

Non-permanence risk considerations and buffer approach (for land-use/NBS and removals).